home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com!news
- From: Ken Garlington <GarlingtonKE@lfwc.lockheed.com>
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.c++
- Subject: Re: C/C++ knocks the crap out of Ada
- Date: Tue, 12 Mar 1996 12:56:49 +0000
- Organization: Lockheed Martin Tactical Aircraft Systems
- Message-ID: <31457491.244A@lfwc.lockheed.com>
- References: <00001a73+00002504@msn.com> <1996Feb22.005518.13396@leeweyr.sccsi.com> <4gvrffINNlqo@anvil.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca> <4h5hgj$vpd@tomquartz.niestu.com> <4h7jskINNnph@anvil.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca> <313EDF38.61C1@lfwc.lockheed.com> <TANMOY.96Mar7180321@qcd.lanl.gov> <4i01hb$s6j@new-news.cc.brandeis.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: cliffy.lfwc.lockheed.com
- Mime-Version: 1.0
- Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
- Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
- X-Mailer: Mozilla 2.0 (Macintosh; I; 68K)
-
- dernis@binah.cc.brandeis.edu wrote:
-
- > It would seem to me
- > that any language which incorporates range checking, bound
- > checking, garbage collection, etc. from the get go loses the
- > flexibility of higher performance in critical areas.
-
- With respect to checking, you might be right - for those languages that
- don't permit the suppression of run-time checks for those _critical_ areas.
- Fortunately, Ada permits check suppression.
-
- As to garbage collection, you may be right there, too. Fortunately,
- Ada doesn't require garbage collection, although it does provide the
- means to implement it if desired.
-